|
Title
|
|
Unknown |
Date |
|
January 1905 |
Calligraphy |
|
Unknown |
Paper |
|
Unknown |
Manuscript structure and collation |
|
|
Provenance |
|
Unknown |
Facsimiles |
|
None |
Select Bibliography |
|
None |
Notes |
|
Exactly when in January 1905 it became apparent that this song could
not be performed by a tenor at the concert on 29 January is
not known, but this change in plan meant that a
new medium-voice orchestral version (score and parts, and
piano-vocal score) had to be completed so that it could be
rehearsed and sung by a baritone. At the beginning of the
month Mahler's conducting schedule at the court opera was
not particularly busy, although on 12 January the piano
rehearsals for a new production of Das Rheingold
commenced (from
Hofopernspielplan):
Date |
Performance |
Rehearsals |
03.01.1905 |
Die Hochzeit des Figaro |
|
08.01.1905 |
Fidelio |
|
12.01.1905 |
|
Das Rheingold (piano
rehearsal) |
13.01.1905 |
|
Das Rheingold (piano
rehearsal) |
14.01.1905 |
|
Das Rheingold (piano
rehearsal) |
17.01.1905 |
|
Das Rheingold (orchestra
rehearsal) |
18.01.1905 |
|
Das Rheingold (orchestra
rehearsal) |
19.01.1905 |
|
Das Rheingold (orchestra
rehearsal) |
21.01.1905 |
|
Das Rheingold (Generalprobe) |
22.01.1905 |
Fidelio |
|
23.01.1905 |
Das Rheingold |
|
25.01.1905 |
Das Rheingold |
|
28.01.1905 |
Das Rheingold |
Mahler Liederabend (Generalprobe:
14:30) |
Mahler was used to finding time for the preparation of fair
copies of his scores during the opera season so it may be
that Mahler himself prepared [AF5m] from scratch. However,
if the song was re-assigned to Weidemann relatively late in
the month, Mahler
may have engaged a copyist (Zöphel?) to prepare a transposed
version that he then revised (quite substantially, not least
its orchestration) and from which a new set of orchestral parts was
produced.
In this context it is notable that the only currently known manuscript
orchestral score of this medium-voice version of the song
was probably not prepared in Vienna, but in Leipzig (see
ACF5m). This may indicate that
the editorial team at Kahnt believed that the score Mahler supplied was,
for some reason, not usable as a printer's copy, and so
commissioned a new copy, which was indeed used as the
printer's copy for the engraving.
|
|
|
|