|
Title
|
|
None, but has an autograph
pencil note in the upper margin of fol. 1r: nach Es-dur
transponiere[n] |
Date |
|
[17–22 August 1901] |
Calligraphy |
|
Ink, pencil (revisions and
annotations) |
Paper |
|
18 staves, no maker's
mark,
upright format, no watermark, 328 x 255 (r=???) |
Manuscript structure and collation |
|
1 bifolio¹ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provenance |
|
Gift from Mahler to Justine Rosé (1868–1938);
bequeathed by her to her son Alfred Rosé (1902–1975); bequeathed
by him to Henry-Louis de La Grange (1925–2017); now part of the
Collection de La Grange-Fleuret, Foundation de France (on
deposit at the Médiatèque Musicale Mahler) |
Facsimiles |
|
Online colour facsimile;
GMIBW, 82;
GMHOE,
137 (b&w);
SMMRC,
392–393 |
Select Bibliography |
|
FDLG, 3;
MFCMC,
p. 32;
GMIBW;
SHCoI;
SHGoI;
SWXIII/4, Ms I, p. xv;
SWXIV/4, Ms I, p. xv |
Notes |
|
This is a carefully prepared and elegant
manuscript. The rhythmic and metrical organisation of the song
had been largely finalised, except for b. 15. This was a 2/4 bar
in the second short score draft (SS52),
but Mahler now expanded it to a 6/4 bar to incorporate an
instrumental anticipation of the vocal line in b. 16. However,
after Mahler had adopted this new reading in the full score (AF5h),
Alma had copied the new version (ACF5h)
and Emil Zöphel had
prepared a transposed manuscript copy (ACV5m), Mahler, first in pencil and
later in ink, revised AV5h to revert to the original reading in
SS52 (see
SHGoI, 27) and the three later scores (AF5h, ACF5h and ACV5h)
were adjusted accordingly. This reversion
to the shorter reading of b. 15 was clearly made at a late
stage, possibly after the first two performances. The paper
used in this manuscript is of poor quality, and was not one of
Mahler's preferred papers manufactured by Jos. Eberle & Co.
There is evidence that Mahler had been short of suitable paper
at the start of the his 1901 vacation and this paper may be of
the same type as that used for the autograph voice and piano
fair copy of
„Ich atmet'
einen linden Duft‟
(AV4)
but the latter has been carelessly trimmed, so more detailed
comparisons are needed. Nevertheless, the quality of the
paper alone suggests that the present manuscript was prepared
before Mahler returned to Vienna, where he would have had easy
access to better quality music stationery.
The conjectural dating proposed
above is framed by the completion date of the second draft of
the song (SS2),
16 August 1901, and the likely date of Mahler's departure (23/24
August: see
GMB2a, 285–8;
GMSL,
253–5). |
|
|
|