|  | Quartet for Piano, 2 
		Violins und Viola  
			
			
				| Title
				
 |  
				|  | Quartett für Piano, 2 Violinen und Viola |  
				| Date |  
				|  | [1876] |  
				| Scoring |  
				|  | Piano, violin I, violin II, viola |  
				| Duration |  
				|  | Unknown |  
				| Manuscripts |  
				|  | Lost |  |  
				| Printed Editions |  
				|  | 
		None |  |  
				| Notes |  
				|  | Evidence 
				for this work (or arrangement) survives in the handbill of the concert organised 
				by Mahler at the Hotel Czap in Iglau, on 12 September 1876, in 
				which three of his fellow students at the Vienna Conservatoire 
				also participated: 
				 
				Fig. 1. Concert Handbill. Iglau, 12 September 
				1876 
				 
				Fig. 2. Iglau: Hotel Czap, c. 1900 
				(Source: 
				Stará Jihlava)   
				 
				Fig. 3. Iglau: Saal im Hotel Czap, c. 1900 
				(Source: 
				Stará Jihlava) This concert, which was 
				apparently not well attended, received an extensive and positive 
				review in the local newspaper, the Mährische Grenzbote, 
				on 17 September 1876:¹ 
					
						
							| 
							Kompositionskonzert zugunsten des 
							Iglauer Gymnasiums   
							Konzert Gustav Mahler. Ein gewähltes 
							Publikum hatte sich Dienstag abends zu dem Konzerte 
							des Herrn Gustav Mahler, dessen Verdienst die 
							Einführung der Herren Siebert, Grünberg und 
							Kržyžanowski hier ist, eingefunden. Es war nach 
							Walter-Door eines der besten und eines der hier 
							gewiß seltenen Konzerte, in welchem wir zwei 
							Komponisten, Herrn Gustav Mahler und Herrn Rudolf 
							Kržyžanowski kennen lernten. Zuerst Nummer i das 
							Klavierquintett von Rudolf Kržyžanowski, dessen 
							ersten Satz wir bloß zu hören bekamen. Was den Wert 
							dieses Werkes anbelangt, so sind nicht nur die 
							Themen, sondern auch die Durchführung sehr 
							sorgfältig gearbeitet. Das erste Thema ist tragisch, 
							das zweite leidenschaftlich gehalten. Die 
							Durchführung beginnt mit einer Doppelfuge, breitet 
							sich mit leidenschaftlichem Schwunge aus und sinkt 
							allmälig weiter herab bis zum Ruhepunkte, welchen 
							der Komponist sehr geistreich aus dem 
							Mittelsatzthema (Adagio) gewählt hat. Mit dem 
							Hauptthema, welches hier als Trauermarsch auftritt, 
							schließt der erste Satz. Wir können mit Recht 
							behaupten, daß der Komponist mit diesem Quintette 
							ein schönes Werk geschaffen und daß wir ihn einst 
							unter die ersten Größen zählen können werden. | 
							Composition Concert for the benefit 
							of the Iglau Gymnasium.   
							A Gustav Mahler Concert. A select 
							audience attended the concert on Tuesday evening 
							given by Herr Gustav Mahler, whom we have to thank 
							for bringing Messrs Siebert, Grünberg and 
							Kržyžanowski to Iglau. Apart from the visit of 
							Walter and Door, it was one of the best of our 
							concerts, and it was certainly one of the most 
							unusual, since it gave us the chance to make the 
							acquaintance of two composers, Herr Gustav Mahler 
							and Herr Rudolf Kržyžanowski. 
							The first piece on the programme was 
							Rudolf Kržyžanowski's Piano Quintet, of which we 
							heard only the first movement. The merit of this 
							work is that not only the themes, but also the 
							development, are very carefully worked out. The 
							first subject is tragic and the second passionate 
							but restrained. The development begins with a double 
							fugue, unfolds with passionate momentum, and 
							gradually sinks down to the point of repose, an 
							ingenious adaptation of the central theme (Adagio). 
							The first movement ends with a repeat of the main 
							theme, which now appears as a funeral march. We can 
							justifiably maintain that the composer of this 
							quintet has created a beautiful work, and that, the 
							time will come when we can number him among the 
							great. |  
							| 
							Die zweite Nummer (Konzert D moll von 
							Vieuxtemps) spielte Herr Siebert, ein Schüler 
							Hellmesbergers, und machte seinem Meister in jeder 
							Hinsicht nur Ehre. Die kräftige und schöne 
							Bogenführung, der seelenvolle, weiche, doch volle 
							Ton fesselte die Herzen der Zuhörer. Diese Vorzüge 
							sowohl, als die brillante Technik, besonders aber 
							die Auffassung hat Herr Siebert seinem Lehrer 
							Hellmesberger, dessen Weltruf und künstlerische 
							Bedeutung nicht erst erwähnt zu werden braucht, 
							abgelauscht.  | 
							The second item (Concerto in D minor 
							by Viextemps) was played by Mr. Siebert, a pupil of 
							Hellmesberger, and honored his master in every 
							respect. The powerful and beautiful bowing, the 
							soothing, soft yet full tone captivated the hearts 
							of the listeners. These virtues as well as the 
							brilliant technique and particularly the conception, 
							Siebert has learned from his teacher, Hellmesberger, 
							whose world-wide fame and artistic significance need 
							hardly be emphasised. |  
							| 
							Der Konzertgeber, Herr Mahler, trat 
							vorerst als Klavierspieler (Wandererphantasie von 
							Fr. Schubert) auf und hatten wir Gelegenheit, seine 
							ganz originelle Auffassung und Spielweise zu 
							bewundern. Man findet es eben selten, daß die vor 
							das Publikum tretenden Musiker, die Tonschöpfung so 
							ganz aus sich selbst heraus wiedergeben und gerade 
							dies ist das Ideal eines reproduzierenden Künstlers. | 
							Herr Mahler, the organizer of the 
							concert, next appeared as a [solo] pianist, and his 
							playing of Franz Schubert's Wanderer Fantasia gave 
							us the chance to admire his entirely original 
							interpretation and technique. It is only rarely that 
							musicians come before the public who know how to 
							re-create music from their own inner resources; it 
							is this ability that is the ideal of an executant 
							artist. |  
							| 
							Die nächsten zwei Nummern 4 und 5, 
							Sonate für Violine und Piano und das Klavierquintett 
							hatten Herrn Mahler zum Autor. Es fällt uns schwer 
							zu bestimmen, welche von diesen beiden Nummern den 
							höheren Rang einnimmt. In diesen beiden 
							Kompositionen finden wir eine imponierende 
							Gedankenfülle, wie auch eine sehr geschickte 
							Ausführung, welche den genialen Komponisten 
							kennzeichnet. Der sehr schwierige Violinpart der 
							Sonate wurde von Herrn Siebert technisch und geistig 
							sehr schön wiedergegeben. Den Klavierpart spielte 
							der Komponist selbst. Über das Klavierquintett 
							bemerken wir nur, daß dasselbe den ersten Preis im 
							Konservatorium zu Wien errang. In demselben sowohl 
							als auch in der Violin-Sonate fiel uns ein 
							entschieden dramatischer Zug auf. | 
							The next two works, numbers 4 and 5, 
							Sonata for Violin and Piano and Piano Quintet, were 
							both composed by Herr Mahler. It is difficult for us 
							to decide which of these two works is the better. 
							Both of them show an impressive wealth of ideas and 
							a great skill in execution which reveal him as a 
							composer of genius. Herr Siebert played the very 
							difficult part in the Violin Sonata beautifully, 
							both in technique and interpretation. The piano part 
							was played by the composer. All we need say about 
							the Piano Quintet is that it was awarded the first 
							prize at the Conservatoire in Vienna. We were 
							struck, in this as in the Violin Sonata, by a 
							decided vein of drama. |  
							| 
							Nummer 6 (Ballade von Chopin) wurde 
							abermals von dem unermüdlichen Konzertgeber in 
							vortrefflicher Weise exekutiert und sehen wir in ihm 
							den würdigen Schüler Epsteins. Den Schluß des 
							Konzertes bildete ein von den Herren Siebert und 
							Grünberg gespieltes Doppelkonzert für zwei Violinen 
							von Alard, welches schön nuanciert und brillant 
							vorgetragen wurde. | 
							The sixth piece (a Ballade by Chopin) 
							was played by the indefatigable concert organizer, 
							who once again performed superbly, and showed 
							himself to be a worthy pupil of Epstein's. The final 
							piece of the concert was a Double Concerto for two 
							Violins by Alard, which was brilliantly played, with 
							beautiful shades of expression, by Herr Siebert and 
							Herr Grünberg.  |  
							| 
							Die Aufführung der beiden Quintetts 
							war eine musterhafte und der reichliche Beifall des 
							Publikums nach jedem Vortrage somit auch verdient. | 
							The performance of the two quintets 
							was exemplary, and the audience's enthusiastic 
							applause after each item was well deserved. |  This review is 
					tantalizing, not least because of the terms in which it describes 
					Mahler's already evident gift for interpretation, but it is 
					frustrating that the reader learns more about Krzyzanowski's 
					chamber work than Mahler's, and that a comparison of the 
					review with the programme raises and leaves unresolved a 
					number of questions about both the 'quartets'. The 
					reviewer specifically identifies Mahler's 'quartet' as
					having been 'awarded the first prize at the 
					Conservatoire in Vienna',² 
					so unless the writer had mistakenly associated the two 
					works, this offers evidence that Mahler's Quintet and 
					Piano Quartet may be one and the same work. In this context it is 
					particularly significant that on 22 December 1875 the first 
					movement of a Piano Quintet in C minor by Krzyzanowski was 
					performed at a students' concert at the Vienna 
					Conservatoire.³  So, given 
					that both composers had written quintets during the previous 
					year, it seems possible (perhaps likely) that the two 
					'quartets' listed in the handbill were indeed arrangements 
					of these (piano) quintets. If so, the apparent need to 
					perform arrangements of the quintets is noteworthy, 
					since Iglau had a well-established theatre with its own 
					small orchestra (24 players in 1874), and Mahler had close 
					contact throughout his life with his teacher, the 
					Stadtlicher Musikdirektor and sometime Musikdirektor 
					at the theatre, Heinrich Fischer (1828–1917).⁴ 
					However, local professional schedules may have precluded the 
					participation of any of the town's cellists, and the 
					involvement in the concert of local musicians is not 
					recorded in the review. Other 
					uncertainties surround this event: 
					 
						
						Who played the piano parts? In the absence of any indication to the contrary in the 
						handbill or review it must also be assumed that the
						'indefatigable' Mahler played the 
						piano throughout.
						Who played the viola in the two 
						quartets?Perhaps the second study violinist, Krzyzanowski, though 
						at the December performance of his work he had played 
						the piano part.
						Which Chopin Ballade was heard?Perhaps most probably No. 1 in G minor op. 23, as it was 
						the only one on the syllabus of the Vienna 
						Conservatoire.
						How many movements of Mahler's 'quartet' 
						were heard?In the case of Krzyzanowski's work, the 
						reviewer reports that only the first movement was heard, 
						but tantalisingly gives no clue as to how much of 
						Mahler's work was performed.
 Of the performers, Rudolf Krzyzanowski 
					(1862–1911) was a life-long friend and colleague, though 
					Mahler was probably closer to Rudolf's brother, the author 
					Heinrich Krzyzanowski. No doubt it was Rudolf – having 
					studied violin at the Conservatoire for a number of years – 
					who recruited Grünberg (with whom he had performed on at 
					least a couple of occasions) and Siebert. It is interesting that both Siebert 
					and Grünfeld were described on the handbill as members of 
					the Hofopernorchester although Grünberg is not listed 
					at all as a member in
				
				WBWO and Siebert (1856–1938) did not formally join until 1. 
					March 1878 (WBWO, 
					92). He subsequently had a long career with the orchestra 
					(and the Vienna Philharmonic) and from 1899 was Director of 
					the Ballet Orchestra and solo violinist before retiring in 
					1925: so from 1897–1907 he would have worked regularly with 
					Mahler.  He was also active as a chamber musician and 
					was a member of the Rosé Quartet (1889–97) and the Prill 
					Quartet. 
					 
					Fig. 4 The Rosé Quartet (c. 1898)   
					 
					Fig. 5: Prill Quartet (c. 1898) 
					See also:
					
					First movement of a Quintet (1876) |  
				| Select Bibliography |  
				|  | HLG1, 
				36–38; 
				
				DM1, 35, 278–79;
				
				
				
				
				Martner2, 15–17. |  |