|
Completion
Despite the absence of dates on a number of the crucial
autograph manuscripts of the individual songs, Mahler
scholars are broadly agreed that three were composed in the
summer of 1901 and two more in the summer of 1904: either nos 2
and 5 (see
BONW, passim;
COLK, passim;
HLG II, 826–27) or nos. 3 and 4 (DM3,
111–121). On the other hand, despite her not always
reliable memory, Alma recalled that two songs had been written
in 1901 and that three were added in 1904 (AMGM,
89).
Henry-Louis de La Grange makes a more general, and pertinent
suggestion: that the impetus to complete
the cycle was provided by Mahler's involvement with the Vereinigung schaffender Tonkünstler Wiens
(HLG
II, 710).
By the summer of 1903 Schoenberg and Zemlinsky were living in the same apartment block in
the 9th District of Vienna, and they began to formulate plans
for a new society to promote adequate performances of
contemporary music, whose existence was announced on 1 April
1904, in a Neue Freie Presse
article 'Eine neue musikalische Vereiningung' by Guido
Adler, who noted that initially Beethoven's late works, and those of
Wagner, Brahms and Bruckner had not been welcomed by
Viennese audiences:
Jeder muß sich zuerst
an seine „mitfühlenden und mitschöpferischen Freunde‟
wenden, an die Mitwisser seiner Kunst. Der neue
Verein will dies in gleicher Weise tun, und es wäre
zu wünschen, daß die Teilnahme begegne, welche
seiner Leistung würdig ist.
Noch sind die Träger dieser Bewegung nicht genannt,
der Aufruf is nicht unterfertigt, er ist nur datiert:
„März 1904‟. Die „Mehrzahl der schaffenden Künstler
Wiens‟ wird von einige genannt: Alexander v.
Zemlinsky, Josef v. Wöß, Karl Weigl, Franz Schmidt,
Arnold Schönberg, Oskar Posa, Gustav Gutheil – Namen,
nach dem sezessionistischen Alphabet geordnet; zum
größeren Publikum zum Teil noch wenig bekannt,
gewinnen sie in Musikerkreisen Ansehen und Anhang.
Die Auffurung von Werken wird durchaus nicht auf die
Mitglieder der „Vereinigung schaffenden
Künstler Wiens‟, deren Zahl bisher neunzehn beträgt,
beschränkt sein....In Saison 1904/05 sollen drei
Orchesterkonzerte und drei Kammermusik- und
Liederabende veranstaltet werden. Zum Frommen der
neuen Unternehmung hat sich Gustav Mahler bereit
gefunden, eine oder die andere Aufführung zu
dirigieren. Ist er doch in Oesterreich als geistiger
Führer der „Jungen‟ aufzusehen. |
|
Everyone must first
turn to their "sympathetic and creatively
like-minded friends," those who know about their
art. The new association intends to do this in the
same way, and it would be desirable to have
participation worthy of its achievement.
The supporters of this movement have not yet been
named, the appeal is not signed, it is only dated:
"March 1904". Of the "majority of creative artists
in Vienna" some may be named: Alexander v. Zemlinsky,
Joseph v. Wöß, Karl Weigl, Franz Schmidt, Arnold
Schönberg, Oskar Posa, Gustav Gutheil – names
arranged according to the secessionist alphabet;
still little known to the larger public, they gain
respect and support in musicians' circles. The
performance of works will by no means be limited to
the members of the "Association of Creative Artists
in Vienna", the number of which has so far been
nineteen.... In the 1904/05 season three orchestral
concerts and three chamber music and song recitals
are to be organised. To help the new venture, Gustav
Mahler agreed to conduct one performance or another.
After all, in Austria he is to be regarded as the
spiritual leader of the "young people". |
|
|
|
Mahler was presumably approached at the beginning of 1904 by
proponents of the Association,
though, it would appear, merely as a potential conductor of one of the
Society's first concerts. By 8 April the Statutes of the new
society had been submitted to the Statthalterei²
and the inaugural general meeting, at which Mahler was
unanimously elected Honorary President, was held on the 23
April.³
The society publicly invited the submission of works for
possible performance at its concerts and by the end of September
1904 had received 858 submissions from 127 composers.⁴
Exactly when Mahler and the other executive members agreed that
his concert should be devoted to performances of his orchestral
songs seems not to be documented.
Alma Mahler's memoir indicates that Mahler
probably worked on the song-cycle early in his 1904 summer
vacation (AMGM,
89), and his correspondence provides an approximate terminus
ante quem: on 11 July he wrote to Alma requesting that she
bring the manuscripts of the two inner movements of the Sixth
Symphony with her to Toblach (GMBaA,
no. 100, p. 115). Mahler had presumably drafted the additional
songs and now wished to resume work on his next symphony.
Mahler's normal practice was to prepare fair copies (in this
case, a full score and a version for voice and piano) of the
newly finished songs in his spare time during the new opera
season; these would then form the copy-texts for manuscript
vocal scores, full scores, and sets of orchestral parts prepared
by copyists. These would be needed for rehearsal and performance
of the work and later, by the publisher, for the preparation of
the first edition. In this context it is notable that the five
songs in the manuscript full score (ACF)
of the cycle, are the work of four different copyists: no. 1: an
unidentified Viennese copyist; nos 2–3: Josef Strohs; no. 4:
Alma Mahler; no. 5: Emil Zöphel. This suggests that Mahler was
under time pressure. The new scores were essential so that their
accompanying part sets could be prepared and until the date of
Mahler concert was moved from 6 to 29 January (see below), this
was a matter of some urgency.
First Performance
Adler's extended and supportive article reported that it was originally envisaged that six concerts
(three orchestral and three chamber/vocal concerts would be given
in the Vereinigung's 1904/05 season, of which one of the orchestral concerts
would be conducted by Mahler. However, he also foresaw that the
main issue would be the recruitment of wealthy patrons who would
underwrite any deficits, commenting that 'talent must be united
with worldly wisdom'. He also observed that Viennese publishers of
new music might conceivably have seen it in their own interest to
mount or at least subsidise concerts of new music. To what
extent the society's officers heeded Adler's advice is
uncertain, but it may be significant that he pointed to the
current fashion for Lieder recitals devoted to the output of a
single composer were currently fashionable: the earliest newspaper
announcements of the Society's 1904–05 season included a concert
on 6 January devoted entirely to Mahler's orchestral songs,
conducted by the composer.⁵ This
was followed on 20 November by an announcement – motivated,
perhaps by a mixture of benevolence and/or the need to fill a
few more seats – that for the Society's first concert, on 23rd,
high-school students would be admitted to the gallery at half
price. A further announcement at the end of October gave
29 January as date for the concert of orchestral songs,⁶
a change presumably necessitated by an unavoidable alteration to
the Hofoper
repertoire, which required two of Mahler's singers, Erik
Schmedes and Anton Moser, for a performance of 'Cav & Pag' on 6
January. On the other hand, a replacement for the original,
unidentified singer of the orchestral songs by Oskar Posa to be
heard at the second orchestral concert (25 January) – the Polish
baritone Dr Konrad von Zabilowski (1880–1958) – was not
announced until a week before the event.⁷
For all the practical experience of Mahler and Zemlinsky, it
might be doubted whether there was an experienced or effective
manager overseeing the organisation and publicity for Society's
first season. Only one advert appeared in the Vienna press: the
various announcements and changes of plan were brief paragraphs
included in the arts pages of a few newspapers. Nevertheless, by
24 January Mahler's concert was sold out: in response tickets
for the afternoon dress rehearsal were
made available, and a repeat of the concert arranged for
3 February. (See also the entry for the
Sieben Lieder for a further details of the preparation for
and participants of the event.)
Publication
It was probably no accident that Alfred Hoffmann, the director
of C.F. Kahnt visited Mahler at his hotel when the composer was
in Leipzig for the local première of his Third Symphony in late
November 1904. Hoffmann may have been aware of press
announcements,
which began to appear in mid-October 1904,
for the third concert of the
Vereinigung schaffender Tonkunstler Wiens
in January 1905,
indicating that it would be devoted entirely to Mahler's
orchestral songs. If so, he may have surmised that some of these
were unpublished. His approach must have seemed fortuitous to
Mahler: performance material for the new songs had to be
prepared for the concert (and the copying was presumably already
under way) so it could be refined and corrected following
rehearsals and performance in preparation for publication, and
he wrote immediately to Alma (GMBaA,
234;
GMBaAE, 192):
Eben war ein Verleger (Kahnt) bei mir
un bewarb sich mit Leidenschaft um die neuen Lieder
und Balladen. Ich werde ihm von Wien aus die
Clavierauszüge schicken, und er wird mir dan ein
Angebot machen. |
I've just had a
visit from a publisher (Kahnt), who is eager to
acquire my new Lieder and Ballads. I'll send him the
piano arrangements from Vienna and he'll make an
offer. |
In the event it was perhaps not until March the following year
that the copies were dispatched to Hoffmann (see below).
Some figures relating to early C.F. Kahnt print orders (1905–13)
and sales of the piano-vocal score of Kindertotenlieder survive at A-Wigmg
(see
RKGMK, 171). These offer tantalising, though not wholly
unambiguous insights into the distribution of the song cycle,
especially when combined with information derived from the
relevant UE
Verlagsbuch:
|
Kahnt
Print
Orders |
Sales |
Stock
at Y/e |
UE
orders |
1905 |
500 |
165 |
335 |
|
1906 |
|
≈80 |
255 |
|
1907 |
|
≈80 |
175 |
|
1908 |
300 |
≈80 |
395 |
|
1909 |
|
≈80 |
315 |
|
1910 |
|
130 |
185 |
200 |
vii.1911 |
500 |
|
|
|
viii.1911 |
|
|
|
206 |
xi.1911 |
|
|
|
300 |
xi.1911 |
1000 |
269 |
1416 |
|
1912 |
300 |
|
|
300 |
1913 |
2000 |
|
|
600 |
Totals |
4600 |
564 |
|
1606 |
Table 1.
Print runs and sales (Kahnt) and UE orders of
Kindertotenlieder,
piano-vocal score 1905–13
The figures in columns 2–4 are from documents in
the Kahnt archive now housed at A-Wigmg (see
RKGMK, 171):
Print orders 1905–15: Kahnt-11; sales figures
1905–12: Kahnt–10;
Stock at Year/end: editorial (derived by subtracting sales from
the available stock)
Taken at face
value these figures would suggest that Kahnt was warehousing a
substantial amount of unsold stock. Reinhold Kubik reports (loc.
cit.) that between 1905 and January 1912 848 copies
were sold, but even if this higher figure were correct, this
would not significantly modify the impression that the documents
are failing to offer a complete picture of the production and
sales figures. In particular, it is unclear whether or not the
U.E. orders from 1910 onwards are reflected in the Kahnt documents
cited.
In the absence of any available documentation of the
licensing arrangement between Kahnt and UE, one can only
speculate whether the printing of sheets used in copies issued
under the UE imprint was undertaken in Leipzig or Vienna. The
entries for 1910 indicate that Kahnt would
not have had enough stock to supply the first UE order, evidence
that might indicate that the transaction was recorded and
accounted for separately and not included in the surviving
Kahnt documents. On the other hand, if the UE
orders up to the end of 1911 are not taken into account it is difficult to understand the
strategy behind the very large order placed at the end of the
year. Kahnt's previous sales figures on their own would not
have justified such a capital investment. In the 6½ years up to
the middle of 1911 Kahnt had ordered 1300 copies and in a year
(1910–11) UE had ordered just over 400 (and subsequently ordered
a further 300 later that year). So, if they don't resolve the
issue of apparent over-production, these figures do provide evidence that UE's
retail performance was probably rather more impressive than
Kahnt's.
As far as the full score is concerned, Reinhold Kubik reports
that between 1905 and 1915 250 copies were printed (this total
may include copies of
PFm1
and
PFm1a) of which only eight were
sold (RKGMK,
171). Given the number of
performances with orchestra (at least 89
up to the end of the 1913/14 concert season) the number of sales
seems implausibly low. This figure appears to derive from a royalty statement for the period ending on 30 June 1915
(Kahnt–14; facsimile:
RKGMK, 169):⁸ perhaps this is not a cumulative statement,
but rather the annual statement which, under the terms of Mahler's 1905
contract with Kahnt, had to be prepared on 1 July every year (FWGMV,
163).
The publicity campaign mounted by Kahnt was extensive and
included a three-part article, 'Gustav Mahler als Liederkomponist'
by Dr. A. Schering, published in the Neue Zeitschrift für
Musik (72/35-36,
30 August 1905; 72/37,
6 September 1905;
72/40, 27 September 1905). Presumably inspired by this
article and
the success of the performances earlier in the year, Schott
advertised the Lieder und Gesänge in the issue containing the
third installment Schering's essay (72/40,
27 September 1905).
Performance Practice and Transpositions
Performance practice, and in particular the issue of
transpositions, are discussed in a separate essay,
Mahler on
the performance of his Lieder (1906–7). Mahler's contract with Kahnt covering the publication of
Kindertotenlieder and the Sieben Lieder permitted the publisher
to issue transposed versions, and in 1915 Kahnt issued a
high-voice transposition of the cycle in which
all the songs were transposed up a minor third.
Critical Editions Low
voice and Piano SWXIII/3:
Gustav Mahler, Kindertotenlieder für eine Singstimme mit
Klavier, Sämtliche Werke,
Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Band XIII, Teilband 3, ed. Zoltan Roman
(Frankfurt: C.F. Kahnt, 1979) Low voice and
orchestra
SWXIV/3: Gustav Mahler,
Kindertotenlieder für eine Singstimme mit Orchester, Sämtliche Werke,
Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Band XIV, Teilband 3, ed. Zoltan Roman
(Frankfurt: C.F. Kahnt, 1979)
Eulenburg: Gustav Mahler, Kindertotenlieder für
Solostimme und Orchester, edited by Andreas Ballstaedt and
Klaus Döge (London: Ernst Eulenburg Ltd., 1988)
This is an impressive edition, and in some respects supersedes
SWXIV/3, although the Eulenberg house
style requires the use of Italian names only for the
instruments. |